Page 118 - Agenda 21
P. 118

Page 118 of 121

             Next  year  the UNFCCC’s  Executive  Secretary Christiana  Figueres  will  call  a  “significant  number  of
             meetings and workshops…to prepare the new agreement.” Then in 2014, UN Secretary General Ban
             Ki-moon will “convene leaders to mobilize the political will to ensure the 2015 deadline is met.”

             The new treaty would be destructive to the American economy by capping greenhouse gases, primarily
             carbon  dioxide,  the  gas  emitted  when  fossil  fuels  are  burned.  The  UN  insists  that  fossil  fuels  be
             replaced  with  solar,  wind  and other  renewable  energy  sources,  but  even  with  billions  of  stimulus
             dollars and taxpayer subsidies, those sources produce woefully inadequate amounts of energy.”

             http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/global-warming/un-takes-concrete-steps-toward-global-tax.html

                  ATTEMPTING TO TAX BILLIONAIRES, CURRENCY TRADING AND OTHER FINANCIAL
                                       TRANSACTIONS, CARBON EMISSIONS, ETC.

             In April of 2012 the United Nations Economic and Social Council proposed a “1 percent tax on
             billionaires around the world. A tax on all currency trading in the U.S. dollar, the euro, the Japanese
             yen and the British pound sterling. Another “tiny” tax on all financial transactions, including stock and
             bond trading, and trading in financial derivatives. New taxes on carbon emissions and on airline
             tickets. A royalty on all undersea mineral resources extracted more than 100 miles offshore of any
             nation’s territory.

             http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/09/27/as-un-opens-its-general-assembly-session-it-is-
             already-thinking-up-new-global/#ixzz2D6EyUXbK

                  ATTEMPTING TO TAX INTERNET CONTENT PROVIDERS AND INTERNET FINANCIAL
                                                      TRANSACTIONS

             “Dec. 3-14, 2012 the UN's International Telecommunications Union (ITU) is holding a conference in
             Dubai, at which U.N. member states will meet to update the ITU treaty arrangements for international
             communications….the  window  will  be  open  for  everything  from  proposals  for  UN-regulated  and
             administered fees…to online censorship and government monitoring of Web traffic.”
             http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/11/un_advances_effort_to_grab_control_of_the_inter
             net.html     http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2012/06/08/is-the-u-n-trying-to-tax-the-
             internet/
             The World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations’ public health arm, is moving full speed
             ahead with a controversial plan to impose global consumer taxes on such things as Internet activity
             and everyday financial transactions like paying bills online  — while its spending soars and its own
             financial house is in disarray.
             http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/05/12/should-the-united-nations-get-to-tax-the-
             internet-atm-withdrawals-and-air-travel/

              ATTEMPTING TO GOVERN HOW TELEPHONE CALLS AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS ARE
                                            EXCHANGED INTERNATIONALLY

             “The United States said Thursday that it will not sign a United Nations telecommunications treaty that
             U.S.  technology  companies  warn  would  disrupt  governance  of  the  Internet  and  open  the  door  to
             online censorship. The U.K. and Canada also said they would not ratify the treaty after negotiations
             ended at a conference hosted by the U.N. International Telecommunications Union (ITU) in Dubai.
             U.S. Ambassador Terry Kramer, who led the U.S. delegation during the conference, told reporters on a
             conference call that the U.S. could not sign the treaty because there were “too many issues here that
             were problematic for us.”
             The treaty is intended to govern how telephone calls and other communications traffic are exchanged
             internationally. While it is not a legally binding document, Kramer said the U.S. opposed extending
             the scope of the treaty to include Internet governance and online content matters.”
             http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/272819-us-says-it-wont-ratify-un-telecom-treaty
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121