Page 69 - Msingi Afrika Magazine Issue 29
P. 69
Art & Culture
fit to ask why 1+1 equals 2 but 1x1 equals reverse the rejection. His patent was cited a
1. But do you know that as simple as that number of times by inventors and examiners
question is, the correct answer to 1x1 and true, but not for the reasons he thinks. Mainly
the adjustment of world mathematics to fit cited to distinguish THEIR patent from his
the correct answer can crash the entire global incredibly generic idea with no tangible
banking and finance system? Including product or method to execute.
taxation, salary structures, insurance,
everything connected to money, numbers, Msingi Afrika Magazine: Accepted or
and everything in between. But this a good rejected patent makes no difference and that’s
example of the power of one and the change not even what this post is about. Should 1+1
that one question can create in a world equal 2 and 1×1 equal 1? That’s what this
system that was created and sustained to raise post is about. Share your answer.
zombies and non-free thinkers. Joey Cortez: He actually said 1x1 = 2 which
The same question can be asked; why is One is wrong
US dollar worth 132 Kenyan Shillings or 1x4 = 1+1+1+1 = 4
why should the same One US dollar be worth 1x3 = 1+1+1 = 3
1471 Nigerian Naira? Don’t let them give 1x2 = 1+1 = 2
you stupid economics that makes no sense as 1x1 = 0+1 = 1
to why that is, using indices that were created In maths you don’t start at 1 you start at 0.
by the very minds that want you in perpetual
financial bondage.” Msingi Afrika Magazine: How does
multiplying 1 by 1 become 0? Where did 1
Someone named Joey responded to the post go?
and a long conversation ensued between us. I
am not going to edit the words of the post, to Joey: Simple. Let me explain with an
retain its originality. example: if you have 0 TVs and I give you
1 TV 1 time then you end up with 1 TV thus
Joey: He’s quoted as saying on JRE that 1x1 = 1. 1 in this analogy represents the
“The entire AR/VR [augmented reality/ number of TVs I’m giving you. The second
virtual reality] world was built off of my first 1 is the number “times” I’m giving it to you
patent” yet doesn’t know that in 1968 the (which why we say 1 times 1) so you end up
first virtual reality system and headset was with 1 TV. If I give you 1 TV 2 times then
invented by Ivan Sutherland and his student. you end up with 2 TVs thus 1x2=2.
Patents does not equal invented. Plus his
patent was rejected. His patent was not novel Msingi Afrika Magazine: Then it should
or distinguishable from other established not be called multiplication. Because if am
patents so it was ultimately rejected. After multiplying 1 tv by 2 that should give me 3
rejection he did not follow through on tvs. Or else what happened to the first tv out
providing the requested information to of which I brought out two?
ISSUE 29 | JULY 2024 69