Page 25 - Msingi Afrika Magazine Issue 30

Community
African banks that are represented by ENS.
ENS or Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs itself
has also represented GMO-producing
companies like Pioneer in 2014, when
Pioneer was in court against Monsanto,
which was represented by Bowman and
Gilflan in Monsanto South Africa (Pty)
and other vs Bowman Gillfillan and
others https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/
ZACAC/2011/5.html Pioneer itself is owned
by the U.S. multinational biotech company,
Dow Chemicals, which was one of the tools
that Kissinger and McKinan said will be
used to enable America to control the world
population through food.
This is why my case - fighting for African
health against a GMO supplier - presented
a conflict of interest with the biotech and
GMO-producing companies that ENS
represents, leading them to terminate their
services with me, on frivolous grounds.
Consequently, Zimbabweans and Africans
have become collateral damage due to
imperialist capital interests to propagate
GMOs and toxic food in Africa, more than
saving African lives.
What is even more concerning for me is that
the decision to cancel me for my free speech,
by ENS, was not only reached by non-blacks
but also by some black people who were
part of this discriminatory decision that goes
against broader public welfare and interest.
This is reminiscent of how our chiefs in the
past sold their own people into slavery, not
realizing that in the future, they would be
weakened to the point of being enslaved
on their own continent. Unbeknownst to
the black lawyers at ENS who made this
decision, they just didn’t collaborate with
white supremacy, but they also colluded in
the destruction of the food they need and
the perpetuation of a chemical war against
them and their own children. Happy karma to
them.
The lesson learned from my being ‘canceled’
by ENS is that African lives don’t matter
to white corporate interests, not only in
Zimbabwe, as the Innscor case has shown,
but worldwide. The reason why these black
lives don’t matter is that the most lucrative
clients of law firms are often unethical and
psychopathic corporations that profit from
exploiting and perpetuating crimes against
humanity on Africans. And due to the veils
of either ‘conflict of interest,’ or ‘’managing
reputational risk’, Africans are discriminated
[just like during apartheid] denied legal
services (and other white dominated services
like banking, insurance, animal seed,
universities etc) from the best law firms,
which represent these criminal enterprises.
The message is clear to us as Africans:
we need to empower our own to racially
overhaul our economic, educational, legal,
media, and political systems, to ensure they
serve African interests, because the other
races we are trying to reconcile with are here
to dominate and destroy us, not to coexist
with us.
ISSUE 30 | AUGUST 2024 25