Page 39 - Agenda 21
P. 39
Page 39 of 121
Here’s a book that dismantles the claims of Climatism: Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism
http://www.climatism.net/mad-mad-mad-world/
Here’s a book by a leading champion of climate truth, Senator James Inhofe: The Greatest Hoax: How
the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future
http://www.amazon.com/Greatest-Hoax-Warming-Conspiracy-
Threatens/dp/1936488493/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1358561860&sr=1-
1&keywords=the+greatest+hoax
Here’s a movie on the true cost of the Global Warming hysteria:
http://www.noteviljustwrong.com/
“An analysis of NASA satellite data shows that water vapor, the most important greenhouse gas, has
declined in the upper atmosphere causing a cooling effect that is 16 times greater than the warming
effect from man-made greenhouse gas emissions during the period 1990 to 2001.
The world has spent over $ 1 trillion on climate change mitigation based on climate models that don’t
work. They are notoriously poor at simulating the 20th century warming because they do not include
natural causes of climate change – mainly due to the changing sun - and they grossly exaggerate the
feedback effects of greenhouse gas emissions.
Most scientists agree that doubling the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, which
takes about 150 years, would theoretically warm the earth by one degree Celsius if there were no
change in evaporation, the amount or distribution of water vapor and clouds. Climate models amplify
the initial CO2 effect by a factor of three by assuming positive feedbacks from water vapor and clouds,
for which there is little direct evidence. Most of the amplification by the climate models is due to an
increase in upper atmosphere water vapor.
The NASA water vapor project (NVAP) uses multiple satellite sensors to create a standard climate
dataset to measure long-term variability of global water vapor.
Climate models predict upper atmosphere moistening which triples the greenhouse effect from man-
made carbon dioxide emissions. The new satellite data from the NASA water vapor project shows
declining upper atmosphere water vapor during the period 1988 to 2001. It is the best available data
for water vapor because it has global coverage. Calculations by a line-by-line radiative code show that
upper atmosphere water vapor changes at 500 mb to 300 mb have 29 times greater effect on OLR and
temperatures than the same change near the surface. The cooling effect of the water vapor changes on
OLR is 16 times greater than the warming effect of CO2 during the 1990 to 2001 period. Radiosonde
data shows that upper atmosphere water vapor declines with warming. The IPCC dismisses the
radiosonde data as the decline is inconsistent with theory. During the 1990 to 2001 period, upper
atmosphere water vapor from satellite data declines more than that from radiosonde data, so there is
no reason to dismiss the radiosonde data. Changes in water vapor are linked to temperature trends in
the upper atmosphere. Both satellite data and radiosonde data confirm the absence of any tropical
upper atmosphere temperature amplification, contrary to IPCC theory. Four independent data sets
demonstrate that the IPCC theory is wrong. CO2 does not cause significant global warming.”
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/06/nasa-satellite-data-shows-a-decline-in-water-vapor/
Another dimension of the environmentalists’ commitment to AGENDA 21 is their naturalist
worldview that denies mankind’s spiritual dimension, reducing us to advanced forms of animal life.
That motivates the biodiversity people to elevate animal rights to those of humans.
"In this model, politics loses its left-versus-right conflict and moves instead towards a fundamental
concern for the health of the ecosystem...Democracy is replaced with "biocracy," where not
people but life-sustaining systems are the central concern.”
http://www.forcingchange.org/a_new_world_agenda