Page 60 - Msingi Afrika Magazine Issue 23
P. 60

Food health



          Obviously, this is not going to    Consumption is corporate driven    emissions generated by the
          work. But it’s not necessary or                                       production and transport of
          desirable either. The reality is   To address the climate crisis, we   exported and imported goods
          that the industrial food system    need, in an equitable manner,      and services represent 20-
          is organised around corporate      to reign in the consumption        30% of global greenhouse gas
          profit, not the allocation of      and production of the industrial   emissions. In the case of fruits and
          finite resources (and emissions)   meat, industrial dairy and         vegetables, it’s 36%.
          towards ensuring that all eight    unnecessary foods privileged by
          billion people on this planet have   corporations. Instead, we have   Or consider sugar. While the
          enough nutritious food to eat. We   to give priority to the production   UK’s climate authorities have
          have a global food system built    and consumption of local, healthy   recommended a 20% cut in meat
          on the mass production of a few    foods. The science demonstrating   and dairy consumption by 2030,
          commodity crops for conversion     how much these industrial foods    and a 35% cut for meat by 2050,
          to meat, dairy and processed       contribute to climate havoc        sugar is now coming into focus.
          foods, plus the steady supply      is advancing. We now know
          of luxury items to the wealthy     that reducing consumption of       The UK produces more than
          (think of chocolate, flowers and   industrially produced red meat     enough sugar for its people.
          strawberries) – all of which       and dairy among the well-off or    And this production comes at
          generate huge emissions without    well-fed can reduce diet-related   a “climate” cost related to very
          providing much nutrition in        climate emissions substantially –   high land and water use, the loss
          return.                            by 75%, according to researchers   of topsoil, biodiversity erosion
                                             at Oxford University. And          and misdirected subsidies. The
          This corporate food system is      replacing animal-based foods       health cost is, of course, just as
          also wasteful. One-third of the    with pulses, nuts, fruits and      worrisome, with two-thirds of
          food that is produced is wasted.   vegetables provides major health   British society either overweight
          That means it ends up in landfills   benefits as well: a lower risk of   or obese. But the country imports
          where it generates significant     cardiovascular disease and type    almost twice the amount of sugar
          greenhouse gases, especially       2 diabetes, and reduced mortality   it over-produces, generating an
          methane. Moreover, much of the     from diet-related illness.         even higher climate bill.
          food that corporations produce is
          “junk” to begin with. Nestlé – the   Yet these changes are not to     This excess consumption is
          Swiss company that dominates       be trivialised as, or reduced      driven not by consumer demand
          global grocery shelves and spends   to, individual behaviour. We      but by corporate greed. Sugar
          hundreds of millions of dollars    overproduce and overconsume        is a cheap food ingredient that
          every year on advertising and      food and energy collectively.      increases sales, especially in the
          lobbying to ensure sales of its    Corporate agendas – which          form of highly processed foods.
          products – has acknowledged that   are propelled against the          Imports are baked into the UK’s
          “the nutritional value of less than   public interest through         many free trade agreements to
          half its portfolio of mainstream   marketing, political lobbying      support corporate interests, not the
          food and drinks can be considered   and trade agreements – drive      public’s. British groups are now
          ‘healthy’ using a commonly         both overproduction and            demanding a full restructuring
          accepted definition.”              overconsumption. (See box on       of the industry – all the way to
          Think of all the lands, water and   Jalisco.) The global trade regime   redirecting sugar subsidies to
          energy that could be repurposed    relies on and reinforces ever      make fruit and vegetables more
          towards the production of          more consumption, stimulation      affordable instead.
          nutritious foods if we did away    and growth. Today, according to    Our chance to move
          with the Nestlés of this world.    the World Trade Organisation,      As already noted, while individual


        60        |   we tell the true afrikan story
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65