Page 16 - Agenda 21
P. 16

Page 16 of 121

                                          That’s because it wasn’t marketed as “Maurice Strong’s U.N. infiltration
                                          scheme”,  but  by  using  the  AGENDA  21  motherhood  and  apple  pie
                                          definition of Sustainable Development: “development which meets the
                                          needs  of  the  present  without  compromising  the  ability  of  future
                                          generations to meet their own needs.” Here’s the classic way AGENDA
                                          21  is  defined:  “a  non-binding,  voluntarily  implemented  action  plan  of
                                          the  United  Nations  with  regard  to  sustainable  development”.  Despite
                                          widespread implementation of AGENDA 21 policies, the willfully naïve
                                          media  claims  that  this  written  definition  proves  that  this  scheme  is
                                          harmless.
                                          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGENDA 21

             Sustainable Development  programs  and  organizations  are deceptively camouflaged by hundreds  of
             innocuous and  constantly evolving names such as  “Smart Growth”, “Comprehensive Planning” and
             “Local Governments for Sustainability”. Bafflement and obfuscation

                                                 Many  of  those  who become  curious  about  the wizardry behind
                                                 the AGENDA 21 curtain are confronted with an enterprise with
                                                 such incomprehensible magnitude that they refuse to believe it is
                                                 feasible  or  that  their  country  could  surrender  so  much  of  its
                                                 sovereignty to the corrupt United Nations. Because they haven’t
                                                 yet  discerned  its  manifestations  in  their  own  community,
                                                 tragically, they write it off. They’ve been disarmed.

                                                 The  alarms  are  only  being  sounded  by  the  small  number  of
                                                 people  who  are  both  up  in  arms  about  the  loss  of  liberty  in
                                                 America and are able to wade through the deliberate complexity
                                                 of AGENDA 21.



             Why would America adopt a scheme that originated with an incredibly perverse organization that on
             December 10, 2012 elected Mauritania as Vice President of the U.N. Human Rights Council, a country
             that allows 800,000 of its citizens to live as slaves? Libya and Saudi Arabia belong to that 47 member
             council  and  Syria,  Algeria,  Chad,  China,  Cuba,  Russia,  Saudi  Arabia,  and  Vietnam  are  council
             candidates in the 2013 U.N. election. Incredible.
             http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51661#When:01:16:04Z
             http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/14/slavery-still-shackles-mauritania

             To answer that question, let’s switch the focus from the bewildering international arena from which
             AGENDA 21 originated to ground zero for Sustainable Development deployment: YOUR
             COMMUNITY.
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21