Page 66 - Agenda 21

Page 66 of 121

the specified terms of the agreement.

Mrs. Boneta was not the grantor of the easement on her property nor was she awarded any tax
benefits or subsidies. She bought the property with the easement and is bound by the terms of the
original agreement that are passed on to any subsequent owner permanently. She had a reasonable
expectation that the easement on her farm would assure that the land would be preserved for her
intended purpose - farming.

What could possibly go wrong?

One minute she is a responsible organic farmer with the required license to sell her vegetables and
fruits; the next, she is bullied and fined for contrived violations by Fauquier County Administrators.
They never obtained a warrant nor set foot on her property to gather actual evidence. Instead a county
bureaucrat relied on unscrupulous, unlawful methods to bring charges against Mrs. Boneta. They
ignored due process of law which is a common practice used to intimidate citizens into forfeiting their
rights and ultimately their property.

One would think the PEC would be in her corner and stand up for her right to farm per the
conservation agreement.

But it wasn't enough for the PEC that Martha was bullied into shutting down her farm out of fear of
further uncertain charges by Fauquier County carrying possible criminal penalties. The PEC has now
put Mrs. Boneta on notice that they intend to inspect the Barn Complex and Smithy "for the purpose
of determining if improvements have been made to accommodate residential use".
The conservation easement agreement authorizes the Piedmont Environmental Council the authority
to monitor and enforce the terms of the agreement but the notice completely ignores that the
agreement allows 1600 sq. ft. of residential space in the Barn Complex.

PEC Vice President, Heather Richards, further believes she can ignore the law by prohibiting Mrs.
Boneta from photographing or video recording anyone entering her private property, even to inspect,
while asserting the PEC's right to do so.

In essence, Fauquier County Administrators and the PEC are attempting to pull the land right out
from under the feet of Martha Boneta without due process of law and totally ignoring the terms of the
conservation agreement.

Their position assumes they are above the law and Mrs. Boneta is but a mere serf or tenant on what is
her land, while she is still burdened by taxes and other expenses, and subject to the whim and will of
Fauquier County Administrators (the king) and the Piedmont Environmental Council (the privileged
lords and nobles).

The UN objective of Agenda 21, to extinguish private property rights, is met when wealth and power
(property) is transferred to, and accumulated in the hands of the modern ruling elite: government
agencies and trusts which form an unholy alliance to defraud rural landowners, like Martha Boneta, of
their inherent right of lawful ownership and use of their land.”
http://va10thamendment.org/node/218