Page 62 - Msingi Afrika Magazine Issue 22
P. 62

Food Health



          The result is a catastrophic loss of
          soil organic matter-- the building
          block of healthy soils. Over half
          of the soil organic matter in the
          world’s agricultural soils has al-
          ready been lost, with over 2 billion
          hectares of farmland badly affected.
          [1]It translates into declining crop
          yields, increasing pollution of water
          systems from fertilizer run-off, and
          because soil organic matter is mainly
          composed of carbon, the release of
          enormous amounts of carbon into
          the atmosphere.

          Yet, the main culprits behind this
          soil catastrophe are now recasting   a lot of money that’s potentially out   into their soils. These are generally
          themselves as soil saviors. The    there to be made. Enough to attract   limited to planting cover crops and
          world’s top fertiliser company, Yara,   the most notorious soil miners.  doing less or no-tillage but can also
          recently created an alliance to pursue                                include integrating trees or applying
          “a new solution to our carbon chal-  If this “win-win” sounds too good   fertilizers more efficiently.
          lenge that’s grounded in the soil”.   to be true, that’s because it is. Yes, as
          Global commodity trader Cargill is   La Via Campesina and many other   Farmers log their practices onto cor-
          rolling out several new initiatives   organisations have long argued, we   porate digital platforms, but satellite
          to support what it calls “regener-  need to build carbon back into the   or aeroplane surveillance monitor
          ative agriculture”. “Soil health is a   soils to address the climate crisis.  their farms. Some programmes
          win-win,” says Cargill. Over the past   But this requires a vast programme   require farmers to submit soil sam-
          couple of years, nearly all of the   of agroecology, land redistribution   ples; others rely entirely on remote
          biggest corporate players in agri-  and the re-localisation of food   verification systems. Farmers gener-
          business have launched or joined   systems. And it certainly cannot be   ally have to maintain these practices
          initiatives to restore carbon in agri-  done at the cost of enabling more   and are responsible for keeping the
          cultural soils (see Table 1).      fossil fuel emissions. The carbon   carbon sequestered in their soils for
                                             farming programmes that corpora-   between 5-10 years to fulfil their
          The reason is simple; there is now   tions are hastily pushing are fraught   contract. However, timelines can
          money to be made from storing      with problems. They amount to a    extend to 20 or 25 years.
          carbon in the ground. Governments   big soil grab. These programmes are
          and corporations are desperate to   designed to greenwash pollution and   Farmers are then paid based on
          find ways to avoid making real cuts   consolidate control over food and   the calculated amount of carbon
          to their fossil fuel emissions and are   agriculture in the hands of a small   sequestered and the prevailing price
          willing to pay others to sequester   number of corporations, whose    for carbon in global carbon credit
          carbon so they can continue burning   activities are increasingly integrated   markets. Typically 20-25% is de-
          fossil fuels. The challenge is to find   through digital platforms.   ducted to account for future losses
          places to sequester this carbon-- and                                 of carbon that could occur after
          what better place than in the world’s   The ABCs of  carbon credit    the programme ends or because of
          carbon-depleted farmlands? Some    farming                            calamities like droughts and fires.
          estimate the capacity to sequester                                    The company typically takes another
          up to 3.4 Gt of carbon per year in   The typical soil carbon farming   25% as fees.
          agricultural lands-- which is roughly   programme looks like this.
          one-third of the annual emissions                                     There are a growing number of
          from the fossil fuel and cement sec-  Farmers sign up for the programme   these carbon credit farming pro-
          tors. With a price of about USD$20   online. They then have to start im-  grammes out there, most of them
          per tonne of carbon sequestered on   plementing certain farming practices   led by or connected to a multina-
          today’s carbon credit markets, that’s   that are supposed to draw carbon   tional agribusiness corporation.



        62        |   we tell the true afrikan story
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67