Page 48 - Msingi Afrika Magazine Issue 5
P. 48

ECONOMY

                                                    AFRIKONOMICS



                                                    Theory Part 2




                                                                            Mfuniselwa Bhengu





















               Prof. Herbert Vilakazi (2001), writing in the New Agenda journal (a South African
                Journal of Social and Economic Policy) of 2001 had this to say: “We must real-
                ize that what is called ‘economics’, as it is taught in our universities, is simply a
               reflection of the economic experiences of the White community, which in itself
              is an extension of the economic experiences of developed Western countries. The
               challenge for us in Africa, is to develop a new economics, which shall be a reflec-
                tion of the economic experiences of the overwhelming majority of society, the
                African people…Our economics must begin with an accurate knowledge of the
                situation and needs of the overwhelming majority of Africans in rural and semi
                                 rural areas, and in the townships of urban areas”.




                   ith  Africans,  culture is   is  insufficient  since  it  produces   themselves in terms of ancestry,
                   about how  the past       unemployment, low wages, mo-       religion, language,  history,  val-
          Wmust interact  with the           nopoly,  business  cycle crises    ues, customs, and institutions.
          future. It  is about how social    and bankruptcies; it is transient   People  use politics, not just to
          values are transmitted and indi-   since it will disappear  just as   advance their interests but also
          viduals are made to be part of a   feudalism  and earlier  systems    to define their identity. We know
          society.                           disappeared,  and for the same     who we are only when we know
          Therefore, culture among the       general reasons”.                  who we are not and often only
          Bantus is regulated by the phi-    Perhaps, this is what led  Hun-    when  we know  whom  we  are
          losophy of Ubuntu, which insists   tington (1996: 21) to say “the     against. Nation states remain
          that the very identity of each per-  most  important   distinctions   principal actors in world affairs,
          son is bound up with others in a   among peoples are not ideolog-     and their behavior  is shaped
          community of all. In a globalized   ical, political or economic. They   as in the past by the pursuit of
          world, our sense of Ubuntu must    are cultural. Peoples and na-      power and wealth, but it is also
          extend right across the planet.    tions are attempting to answer     shaped by cultural preferences,
          The more global the market, the    the most basic question humans     commonalities and differences”.
          more it must be balanced by a      can face: Who are you?  And        Marcel Mauss (1990; 76) argued
          global culture of solidarity, atten-  they  are  answering that  ques-  that: “It is our western societies
          tive to the needs of the weakest.  tion in the traditional way human   who have recently made man an
          Dalton (1975) describes capital-   beings have answered it, by ref-   ‘economic animal. But we are
          ism as  “…immoral, unjust  and     erence to the things that mean     not yet all creatures of this ge-
          humanly degrading…Capitalism       most  to  them.  People  define    nus. Among the masses and the




          48   |   heal . restore . rebirth .  Afrika
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53